Re: [Full-disclosure] Linux NULL pointer dereference due to incorrect proto_ops initializations

[Soo-Hyun Choi <s.choi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Excellent catch! This bug report has been sited from many places now.
Thanks to Tavis Ormandy and Julien Tinnes.

--
Soo-Hyun
(s.choi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)


On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 19:57, Tavis Ormandy<taviso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Linux NULL pointer dereference due to incorrect proto_ops initializations
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> In the Linux kernel, each socket has an associated struct of operations
> called proto_ops which contain pointers to functions implementing various
> features, such as accept, bind, shutdown, and so on.
>
> If an operation on a particular socket is unimplemented, they are expected
> to point the associated function pointer to predefined stubs, for example if
> the "accept" operation is undefined it would point to sock_no_accept(). 
> However,
> we have found that this is not always the case and some of these pointers are
> left uninitialized.
>
> This is not always a security issue, as the kernel validates the pointers at
> the call site, such as this example from sock_splice_read:
>
> static ssize_t sock_splice_read(struct file *file, loff_t *ppos,
>                    struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, size_t len,
>                unsigned int flags)
> {
>    struct socket *sock = file->private_data;
>
>    if (unlikely(!sock->ops->splice_read))
>        return -EINVAL;
>
>    return sock->ops->splice_read(sock, ppos, pipe, len, flags);
> }
>
> But we have found an example where this is not the case; the sock_sendpage()
> routine does not validate the function pointer is valid before dereferencing
> it, and therefore relies on the correct initialization of the proto_ops
> structure.
>
> We have identified several examples where the initialization is incomplete:
>
> - The SOCKOPS_WRAP macro defined in include/linux/net.h, which appears correct
>  at first glance, was actually affected. This includes PF_APPLETALK, PF_IPX,
>  PF_IRDA, PF_X25 and PF_AX25 families.
>
> - Initializations were missing in other protocols, including PF_BLUETOOTH,
>  PF_IUCV, PF_INET6 (with IPPROTO_SCTP), PF_PPPOX and PF_ISDN.
>
> --------------------
> Affected Software
> ------------------------
>
> All Linux 2.4/2.6 versions since May 2001 are believed to be affected:
>
> - Linux 2.4, from 2.4.4 up to and including 2.4.37.4
> - Linux 2.6, from 2.6.0 up to and including 2.6.30.4
>
> --------------------
> Consequences
> -----------------------
>
> This issue is easily exploitable for local privilege escalation. In order to
> exploit this, an attacker would create a mapping at address zero containing
> code to be executed with privileges of the kernel, and then trigger a
> vulnerable operation using a sequence like this:
>
> /* ... */
>    int fdin = mkstemp(template);
>    int fdout = socket(PF_PPPOX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
>
>    unlink(template);
>
>    ftruncate(fdin, PAGE_SIZE);
>
>    sendfile(fdout, fdin, NULL, PAGE_SIZE);
> /* ... */
>
> Please note, sendfile() is just one of many ways to cause a sendpage
> operation on a socket.
>
> Successful exploitation will lead to complete attacker control of the system.
>
> -------------------
> Mitigation
> -----------------------
>
> Recent kernels with mmap_min_addr support may prevent exploitation if
> the sysctl vm.mmap_min_addr is set above zero. However, administrators
> should be aware that LSM based mandatory access control systems, such
> as SELinux, may alter this functionality.
>
> It should also be noted that all kernels up to 2.6.30.2 are vulnerable to
> published attacks against mmap_min_addr.
>
> -------------------
> Solution
> -----------------------
>
> Linus committed a patch correcting this issue on 13th August 2009.
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=e694958388c50148389b0e9b9e9e8945cf0f1b98
>
> -------------------
> Credit
> -----------------------
>
> This bug was discovered by Tavis Ormandy and Julien Tinnes of the Google
> Security Team.
>
>
> --
> -------------------------------------
> taviso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | finger me for my gpg key.
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/