[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update

To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update
From: Byron Sonne <blsonne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:53:23 -0400

> my TV licence money isnt for paying criminals.

Bwahahaha!

You suckers have to pay for TV licenses? That's some fucked up shit.
Then again, it IS the nanny state...

-- 
     Byron L. Sonne :: blsonne@xxxxxxxxxxx :: www.halvdan.com
gpg: 0x69D9EAA6, C651 EF07 1298 58B3 615D 4019 E196 BAE1 69D9 EAA6

         "For Good, return Good. For Evil, return Justice"

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update
  - From: Stuart Dunkeld

References:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update
  - From: Matt
- Re: [Full-disclosure] The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update
  - From: A . L . M . Buxey

Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update
Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update
Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update
Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] The BBC acquired a botnet, but was it legal? - Update
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread