Re: [Full-disclosure] List of Fuzzers

[Jeremy Brown <0xjbrown41@xxxxxxxxx>]

Your right, Yahoo! Messenger, Adobe Acrobat, and Firefox only have
around 1000 users worldwide (yes, they all were pubically DoS).

On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:43 PM, julio sanchez <pete.sanches@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> What have you ever written? Let us see some of your code to poke fun
>> of. If it is as imperfect as you then we'd have a day of fun.
>
>
> If i would release something it will be planified, and inovative, i dont
>  submit  shit for  fun or fake fame
>
>>
>> >What's hilarious is that none of them are usefull :)
>>
>> http://www.milw0rm.com/author/1531
>> http://www.milw0rm.com/author/1835
>>
>> 90% of the research above were found by fuzzing, and those are public.
>> Clearly my fuzzers are useful.
>
> Wrong.
> The IE overhyped bug wasn't found with any of your fuzzers, and also do you
> really
> need a fuzzer to find a bug in konqueror ?
>
> The rest of theses lists are once again useless bugs, because these software
> are used by ~1000 users worldwide.
> Let me clarify this: i don't say you cant crash some useless
> cnet/download/.com software
> with your fuzzer, i only say that you cant beat any widly used software with
> your fuzzing methods.
> If you really knew what mean "Intelligent Fuzzing", we wouldn't have this
> discution right now.
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/