[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Apple Safari ... DoS Vulnerability
- To: Michael Krymson <krymson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Apple Safari ... DoS Vulnerability
- From: Thierry Zoller <Thierry@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:09:30 +0100
Dear Michael,
I understand your point, however consider that
your examples are showing the different *impacts* of a DoS condition.
A bug becomes a security problem once it violates at least one of the three
letters C or I or A. That's the point. The impact and risk assesement
is to be done later on and can only be done partialy by a vendor since
the use of the affected products sometimes heavily depends on the
implementation or use case.
MK> I would suggest that DoS conditions are not a priori security issues, but it
MK> certainly depends on the context and whether security has or could have an
MK> *interest* in them.
This is not to be measured or estimated completely by a vendor
but the client/user/integrator of said products in their specific
enviroment and use and abuse cases. For example Internet Kiosk vendors.
--
http://secdev.zoller.lu
Thierry Zoller
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/