[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows 7 UAC compromised
- To: Andy McKnight <andy.mcknight@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows 7 UAC compromised
- From: Miller Grey <vigilantgregorius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:02:56 -0600
...knowing all this, how does it get fixed? What is the proper way for MS
to enforce UAC?
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Andy McKnight <andy.mcknight@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>
> 2009/2/6 Ureleet <ureleet@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>> doesnt this work for other oses?
>
>
> Windows is different in this respect. The number of Windows users who
> don't know/care (or *want* to know) what goes on under the hood is *huge*.
> As long as their current setup allows them to *do their job* then they're
> not going to buy into any upgrade that risks breaking that. That's what's
> important to them.
>
> The biggest driver behind upgrading a Windows OS isn't a new release, or
> security improvements or a fancy GUI. It's hardware replacement. Even this
> was/is stretched with XP with the extended shipment dates and various
> downgrade options you can *still* get on new boxes.
>
> The only people that can really force app developers to change overnight*
> and code for a new, secure Windows OS mostly don't care about it. That
> leaves Microsoft to try and drip feed gradual change that improves the
> situation without rocking the boat.
>
> *relatively.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/