[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert
- To: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] FD / lists.grok.org - bad SSL cert
- From: Tim <tim-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:29:52 -0800
> > How is that better, really? Run tcpdump or ettercap... Either of the
> > tools are off the shelf.
>
> And if the site is using a self-signed cert, how does a 3rd party tcpdump
> manage to get a *decrypted* datastream? Yes, you can still do traffic
> analysis
> on the "X talked to Y with packet sizes A, B, and C" level, but you can't
> look at the data.
You're missing the point of my comment:
Plaintext communication => use tcpdump
Encrypted without a cert => use ettercap (or something similar)
Is there really a non-constant difference in difficulty?
tim
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/