Re: [Full-disclosure] Microsoft issues out-of-band patch

[Ureleet <ureleet@xxxxxxxxx>]

yes, he even says so on his twitter feed.

On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:22 AM, n3td3v <xploitable@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Nick FitzGerald
> <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> n3td3v wrote:
>>
>> <<snip>>
>>> What i'm saying is this: MI5's systems are patched against flaws that
>>> only they know about and their technicians have developed their own
>>> in-house patches for them.
>>>
>>> If that isn't impressive I don't know what is.
>>
>> Didn't you rail against the ZERT efforts when 0-days were being widely
>> used in the wild and MS was doing "nothing much" abou them?
>>
>> Oh, sorry, I forgot which publicity whore I was talking to...
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Nick FitzGerald
>>
>
> Yes, i'm against *publicly available* third party patches of any kind
> and always have been.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Andrew
>
> http://twitter.com/n3td3v
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/