Re: [Full-disclosure] We're letting the bad guys win

[Ureleet <ureleet@xxxxxxxxx>]

uve said that before fucknut.

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:55 AM, n3td3v <xploitable@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> --On Tuesday, December 09, 2008 00:25:18 -0600 Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:03:57 GMT, n3td3v said:
>>>> We need to stop this back and forth fighting its making infosec look
>>>> bad, this isn't what infosec should be about.
>>>
>>> It's making one very small insignificant corner of infosec look bad.
>>>
>>> Let's keep a sense of perspective, guys.
>>
>> Or, to look at it another way, it's tying up all the idiots in one place and
>> keeping the rest of infosec unsullied.  :-)
>>
>
> I agree,
> But full-disclosure shouldn't be full of idiots so why do we let it be
> that way. It's because we reply to them that it happens. I was
> gullible and naive to reply to them, i'm not replying to them anymore.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/