[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Solaris 10 Auditing
- To: "KT" <ktriv3di@xxxxxxx>, <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Solaris 10 Auditing
- From: "Jarmon, Don R" <Don.Jarmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:09:50 -0600
http://blogs.sun.com/jimlaurent/entry/using_the_solaris_security_toolkit
From: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of KT
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 11:02 AM
To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Solaris 10 Auditing
Hello
I am looking for a free audit script / tool to audit host level security
for Solaris 10 machines. Does any one know of any such scripts / tools
around?
Thanks
From: vulcanius <mailto:vulcanius@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 8:44 AM
To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: FD culture!?
It's pretty hilarious that you went and asked John to moderate those who
don't like you n3td3v and then turned around and criticized people for
wanting the same thing, except on a more unbiased level. I'm pretty
positive Cartwright doesn't give a shit about the quality of the list as
I'm guessing he unsubbed himself a looong time ago.
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 1:30 AM, n3td3v <xploitable@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Bipin Gautam <bipin.gautam@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> On 12/7/08, n3td3v <xploitable@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> What's John Cartwright got to do with an unmoderated mailing list?
You
>> joined F-D because you thought it would be partially moderated when
>> someone *you~* don't agree with annoys you? lolcopter. You know where
>> the unsubscribe button is if you don't like this style of mailing
list
>> management, please use it instead of moaning. On a side note, I
>> already asked for Ureleet to be banned, but Cartwright's not
>> interested in partially moderating an unmoderated mailing list. Would
>> you rather the list was partially moderated?
>
> No... but least, less noise! We have two eyes, two ears but one mouth
> for a reason. Listen more, look more but talk less.
>
> I am complaining because whats happening in FD contradicts to;
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> Acceptable Content
>
> Any information pertaining to vulnerabilities is acceptable, for
> instance announcement and discussion thereof, exploit techniques and
> code, related tools and papers, and other useful information.
>
> Gratuitous advertisement, product placement, or self-promotion is
> forbidden. Disagreements, flames, arguments, and off-topic discussion
> should be taken off-list wherever possible.
>
> Humour is acceptable in moderation, providing it is inoffensive.
> Politics should be avoided at all costs.
>
> Members are reminded that due to the open nature of the list, they
> should use discretion in executing any tools or code distributed via
> this list.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
> Lastly, i request you all to only post things that we-all may find
> interesting to read. Personal replies are better taken off-list.
> Please keep noise low.
>
> Please help us to like you more!
>
The charter is just a guideline, its got no law or authority.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
________________________________
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/