Re: [Full-disclosure] More proof that Microsoft products are probably backdoored

[Ureleet <ureleet@xxxxxxxxx>]

all speculation:

no 1 knows 4 sure.

http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/12/17/1754257&from=rss

http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa.02/

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/nsa_backdoor_windows.htm

c how i did that n3td3v?  i posted links, nd talked about the article
w/out stealing ppls work.

pay attention.


On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Andy McKnight <andy.mcknight@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2008/12/2 Ureleet <ureleet@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> u arent getting it.
>>
>> it has nothing 2 do w/ backdoors.  they r talking about actual
>> backdoors in the code.  so that anyone who knows the backdoor can
>> acess any windows system regarless.  they r saying that microsoft has
>> coded backdoors into the system so that the govt can get into any
>> system, patched or not.  pay attention.
>
> I haven't seen anything that suggests that systems are/will be backdoored
> here.  The text of the statement said "remote searches" which in legal terms
> could be anything from something as simple as browsing shared files
> available through P2P to full remote system access.
>
> Do you have anything else that suggests Windows has backdoors present other
> than this statement?
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/