Re: [Full-disclosure] NTLM Multiprotocol Replay attacks

["william@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <william@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

OJ was acquitted of the crime allegedly admitted in his "book". He could 
profit from it then, right?

Of course, he does have a huge debt from the related civil suit he lost and 
any money he makes from anything is fair game.  OJ is not a good example 
there... well, unless he writes a book on his most recent conviction for 
armed robbery/kidnapping here in Las Vegas.

----------------------------------------

From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 9:31 AM
To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] NTLM Multiprotocol Replay attacks 

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:46:50 GMT, n3td3v said:

> We should bring in a law to stop criminal hackers from profiteering
> from their crimes or otherwise reaching any kind of stardom.

You might want to actually investigate what the law really is in your 
area.

In most areas, there already *are* laws that specifically prohibit or
severely restrict a convicted felon's ability to profit from their
notoriety by selling interviews/books/film rights/etc regarding the
crime in question. This is why OJ Simpson will probably see next to
zero profits from any "How I did it" books he tries to sell (the victim's
family has first claim on that money), and why Kevin Mitnick can write
a book about 'The Art of Deception' and make money off it, but he'd 
probably
be on shaky ground if he wrote a book *specifically* about the hacks that
got him landed in jail.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/