Re: [Full-disclosure] Metasploit 3.2 Offers More 'Evil Deeds'

["Michael Simpson" <mikie.simpson@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/10/08, n3td3v <xploitable@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3776831/Metasploit+32+Offers+More+Evil+Deeds.htm
>
> i don't think it should be publicly available, you should need to
> register to prove your who you are, have a background check done on
> you before you get it.
>
Presumably background checks would include looking for issues
regarding mental instability such as those which you have professed to
have on public mailing lists repeatedly and often.

Unless it was just more poor me bullsh*t.

"i could have been a contender if it wasn't for those nasty sec
professionals. i could have completed my Abertay uni course and become
a real man with real skillz rather than being a cut'n'paste w*nk on an
un-moderated sec list".

Note to any potential employers of Andrew Wallace, reading/trolling
seclists/newsgroups does not a cybersecurity professional make.

mike

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/