[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: cnn.com - Homeland Security seeks cyber counterattack system(Einstein 3.0)
- To: <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx>, "n3td3v" <xploitable@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: cnn.com - Homeland Security seeks cyber counterattack system(Einstein 3.0)
- From: "Buhrmaster, Gary" <gtb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:09:38 -0700
> Which is easier to shut down, an attack coming from a relatively small
> number of /16s that belong to the government, or one coming from the
> same number of source nodes scattered *all* over Comcast and Verizon
> and BT and a few other major providers?
>
> Hint 1: Consider the number of entry points into your network
> for the two cases, especially if you are heavily peered with one or more
> of the source ISPs.
The Federal Government (through its "Trusted Internet
Connection" initiative) is trying to limit the number
of entry points into the US Government networks.
(As I recall from 4000 interconnects to around 50,
where both numbers have a high percentage of politics
in the error bar.)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/