Re: [Full-disclosure] McKinnon a 'scapegoat for Pentagon insecurity'

[Ureleet <ureleet@xxxxxxxxx>]

sorry, i been on vacation.  back now bitches!

n3td3v...  u hav sumthing to hide?  as much as i think sachs is full
of it 2, it doesnt meant he wants to take over the world.

u still dont know mckinnons method, which i asked u to elaborate on
months ago.  we're still waiting.

On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:04 PM, n3td3v <xploitable@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:57 PM, n3td3v <xploitable@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> really I don't think hackers are a national security item
>> for a president to worry about...
>>
>
> Marcus Sachs and his cronies don't care though, they want to
> artificially ramp up cyber security, no matter how much the cost or
> disruption... to them cyber security is a national security agenda,
> and they want to convince the average joe it is as well. Bringing Gary
> Mckinnon to U.S is a god send gift for him. He'll be able to get Gary
> Mckinnon onto every television screen in U.S during election time,
> influence middle America, all the areas of America he needs to
> convince about cyber security, get the voting public onside, a better
> job than he managed to do with Die Hard 4.
>
> All the best,
>
> n3td3v
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/