[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] [inbox] Honeypot?
- To: Full-disclosure <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [inbox] Honeypot?
- From: James Lay <jlay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:22:40 -0600
The network I monitor was getting scanned by the below IP. It stopped now
though :)
On 8/30/08 12:02 PM, "Exibar" <exibar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> so do you work for Salsoft, or are you trying to break into a machine owned by
> them?
>
> If it's a network you monitor, meaning you have direct responsibility for,
> wouldn't you already know if it's a honeypot?
>
> sounds fishy that you have to ask....
>
> Exibar
>
>
> From: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Lay
> Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 1:26 PM
> To: Full-disclosure
> Subject: [inbox] [Full-disclosure] Honeypot?
>
> So...one of the networks I monitor has this ip:
>
> 66.139.73.183
>
> Doing netbios scans on it. A cursory inspection shows it as a win2003
> box...that¹s WIDE open. Could this be a honeypot that¹s been compromised?
>
> Curious
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/