[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20
- To: joey.mengele@xxxxxxxxxxxx, valdis.kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Full-Disclosure Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20
- From: "Joey Mengele" <joey.mengele@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 19:50:10 -0400
Valdis,
Furthermore, using scholarly resource WikiPedia, I have been able
to find more flaw in your statement. As it turns out, the jews
actually *are* a small subset:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_population
That is small dude! LOLOL.
Now, we both have accepted that any set is a subset of itself, it
is now proven that jews are a small subset of jews. QED AKA LOLOL.
J
On Fri, 09 May 2008 19:41:18 -0400 Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
>On Fri, 09 May 2008 19:38:24 EDT, Joey Mengele said:
>> Also, I got this for you Valdis, scholarly source WikiPedia to
>> teach you about set theory since you went through all that
>trouble
>> to read 9 RFCs for me:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subset
>>
>> "Any set is a subset of itself, but not a proper subset." -
>> WikiPedia
>>
>> You see, jews are a subset of jews. LOLOLOL, check your work!
>
>You need to read more carefully. I didn't say "jews" wasn't a
>subset of itself,
>I said that "jews" wasn't a *SMALL* subset of itself the way
>"islamic
>fascists" is a small (possibly empty) subset of "muslims".
--
Click to find the latest solutions to enhance your small business.
http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4eDJdVO4MMMaVuY4qK6Ndkh410rG2uFwEDxwpeZzYx3OdTdu/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/