[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Let's outlaw mass securityconferencespamming its f****** gay
- To: Micheal Cottingham <techie.micheal@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Fwd: Let's outlaw mass securityconferencespamming its f****** gay
- From: Jason <security@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:47:54 -0400
We are now close to this space being full circle. The next step is that
the researchers will offer the vendor a chance to compete for the
information on the vuln IP market and as a result winning vendors can
choose to keep it to themselves...
Yep, Microsoft has won and we will soon be back to non-disclosure all
around.
Micheal Cottingham wrote:
> I too have participated in ZDI as a researcher. It is a very good
> program, and both the company and the researcher get what they want
> out of the process. The company gets the time to fix the vulnerability
> before everybody else finds out, and the researcher gets the
> recognition (and some money) for their work. It is a win-win
> situation.
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Ureleet <ureleet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> ive dealt a bit with tipping point and their zdi. how about you learn how
>> it works first, the come back and criticize it? you obviously dont
>> understand the contest at cansecwest, or how zdi plays into it. i was
>> there, it was a good conf.
>>
>> but you need to learn how it works before you go ranting about it....
>> again...
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/