[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] [Professional IT Security Providers -Exposed] Cybertrust ( C + )
- To: "Full-Disclosure dis" <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] [Professional IT Security Providers -Exposed] Cybertrust ( C + )
- From: "Peter Dawson" <slash.pd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:11:43 -0500
Agreed. !!
I think theres a lot of 'fair play' with the secreview folks. -- "We're
going to give Cybertrust a "C" but if you can convince us that they deserve
a different grade then we'll revise our opinion."
So they are open for rebuttals and to changing their opinions !
On Dec 20, 2007 9:55 AM, Epic <epic@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Isn't ANY review subjective to opinion? I do not understand the basis
> of this flame. It appears to me that a lot of the reviews on this site
> offer some great insight into the companies being presented. Granted it is
> an opinion, but that is what a blog is isn't it?
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/