[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] on xss and its technical merit
- To: "reepex" <reepex@xxxxxxxxx>, full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "pdp (architect)" <pdp.gnucitizen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] on xss and its technical merit
- From: nate.mcfeters@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 23:51:38 +0000
What about when xss leads to stack overflows and command injections? See
http://xs-sniper.com. It would seem that if you subscribe to the thought that
only attacks that take over a victims computer are valid, then you would have
to now admit xss as valid as well.
Nate
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-----Original Message-----
From: reepex <reepex@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 13:26:17
To:full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "pdp (architect)"
<pdp.gnucitizen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Full-disclosure] on xss and its technical merit
Pdp architect and I have been emailing back and forth about whether xss has a
place in fd, bugtraq, or the security research area at all. He decided that we
should start a discussion about in on here and gets peoples unmoderated
opinion. This discussion should not concern whether its important due to
stealing bank info, paypal, whatever it should only stick to xss as a pure
research area. Or as pdp described it:
"we are talking about whether XSS is as technical as other security
disciplines. We are also talking about whether it should have a deserved an
recognized place among FD readers and contributers. however, the topic wont
cover only whether you can detect or inject XSS, this is lame. it will cover
the whole 9 yards... pretty much all the topics covered inside the XSS book."
My ideas on the topic are
1) XSS isnt techincal no matter how its used
2) people who use xss on pentests/real hacking/anything but phishing are lame
and only use it because they cannot write real exploits (non-web) or couldnt
find any other web bugs (sql injection, cmd exec,file include, whatever)
3) XSS does not have a place on this list or any other security list and i
remember when the idea of making a seperate bugtraq for xss was proposed and i
still think it should be done.
4) if you go into a pentest/audit and all you get out is xss then its a failed
pentest and the customer should get a refund.
5) publishing xss shows your weakness and that you dont have the ability to
find actual bugs ( b/c xss isnt a vuln its crap )
i think pdp is going to respond first. should be fun ;)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/