Re: [Full-disclosure] full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxx

["Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle@xxxxxxxxx>]

Whoops and sorry Richard! I thought you were referring to the
conversation between netdev(worriedsecurity@xxxxxxxxx) and
netdev(full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxx). It is obvious from reading
further you were referring to netdev's threat of bodily harm to Gadi.

once again, sorry about the mess-up

-JP<the infallible>

On 10/13/07, Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/13/07, worried security <worriedsecurity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 10/13/07, Richard Golodner <rgolodner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Why don't you keep this offline between you and full-disclosure? I know
> > Valdis and he does not give a damn about any of this sophomoric stuff. When
> > you post legitimate security information your credibility is increased as
> > well as the amount of respect you receive amongst the security community.
> > Take this as friendly advice and nothing more. You should not threaten to
> > play games as you may not be aware of who is reading this stuff. I know NSA,
> > Interpol and FBI personnel who read this but will never reveal themselves,
> > but you expose yourself to possible investigation by making threats. And
> > that is never a good idea.
>
> I dont think that The Douchebag can be charged with threatening himself...
>
> You do realize that some trolls register multiple accounts on the same
> mailing list so that they can have the benefit of annoying everyone
> else while only talking to themselves. This is done in order to make
> people like you think that there is a serious discussion going on.
>
> -JP<S00p3r31337D00dV@nW1nk13 boyee'>
>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/