Re: [Full-disclosure] defining 0day

[scott <redhowlingwolves@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Catch a good belly laugh with Steve Shockley's response to Thor(Hammer
of God) over on Bugtraq.


Cheers, Scott

gjgowey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> The game king of the hill comes to mind watching this.  Who will stand alone 
> on top with all others bowing down before him?
>
> Geoff
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Throwaway1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Throwaway1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:04:24 
> To:full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] defining 0day
>
>
> How many days has this RIDICULOUS argument been raging, apparently without
> ANYBODY here mentioning the Medical background of Zero Day? Patient Zero?
> Any of this ringing a bell?
> Not that it matters. The other thing I have yet to see is an explanation of
> why this particular bout of mental masturbation matters. Not that I'm
> expecting to...
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/