Re: [Full-disclosure] defining 0day

[Gadi Evron <ge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Brian Loe wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Gadi Evron <ge@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Okay. I think we exhausted the different views, and maybe we are now able
>> to come to a conlusion on what we WANT 0day to mean.
>>
>> What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean, regardless of
>> previous definitions?
>
>
> Seems to me that definitions, and language itself, is a product of
> evolution. You can't just remove all previous meanings. Its better
> anyway to stick to the most accepted, acknowledged and DOCUMENTED
> definitions:

No longer good enough.

We can get a press scare over a public vuln release, or a wake-up call.

I think we can do better as an industry.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/