[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] SecNiche : Microsoft Internet Explorer Pop up Blocker Bypassing and Dos Vulner
- To: security curmudgeon <jericho@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] SecNiche : Microsoft Internet Explorer Pop up Blocker Bypassing and Dos Vulner
- From: "Steven M. Christey" <coley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:10:48 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, security curmudgeon wrote:
> OSVDB did not begin agressively tracking and cataloging myth/fake
> vulnerabilities until earlier this year.
CVE began a similar practice by using a "** DISPUTED **" or "** REJECT **"
string in the descriptions.
> OSVDB will add legitimate vulnerabilities before myth/fake typically, so
> in some cases they are just at the bottom of the queue.
Same with CVE; so if we've determined that a researcher has a very bad
track record, we'll de-prioritize them on our queue. We don't keep a
specific list of reliable/unreliable researchers, however. A resource
like that would be very useful. Some unreliable researchers do improve,
however.
- Steve
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/