[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Right, or wrong?
- To: Jared DeMott <demottja@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Right, or wrong?
- From: Fixer <fixer@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:42:32 -0800
As far as the "moral/immoral" issue goes I don't think there's an easy
answer to that one.
Is it immoral to get paid for your effort? I don't think so. On the
other hand I don't think
I'd be really proud of myself if I sold a bug to someone and they turned
around and
released a worm that exploited it. I think it depends on who you're
selling to and
why you're doing it. That having been said I should say that I've never
charged anyone
for any bugs I've found. Maybe I'm just old school.
Jared DeMott wrote:
> All:
>
> So, I've tried the vendor pay model for bug hunting and it wasn't always
> well received. Apparently auction sites and 3 party purchasers are
> fine, but some folks don't like the idea of selling directly to the
> vendor. I was thinking that this would be ideal since the vendor would
> have the most interest in knowing about/fixing the bug. My question to
> the list is this:
> Is it morally right, wrong, don't know, don't care, good business, bad
> business, etc.? Either way we're moving away from that model, but I was
> just curious how others on FD see it.
>
> Blessings,
> Jared
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/