[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Right, or wrong?
- To: "Jared DeMott" <demottja@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Right, or wrong?
- From: "Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor" <evdo.hsdpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 17:05:33 -0700
Ask gates what his business position is regarding bugs
On 8/7/07, Jared DeMott <demottja@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> All:
>
> So, I've tried the vendor pay model for bug hunting and it wasn't always
> well received. Apparently auction sites and 3 party purchasers are
> fine, but some folks don't like the idea of selling directly to the
> vendor. I was thinking that this would be ideal since the vendor would
> have the most interest in knowing about/fixing the bug. My question to
> the list is this:
> Is it morally right, wrong, don't know, don't care, good business, bad
> business, etc.? Either way we're moving away from that model, but I was
> just curious how others on FD see it.
>
> Blessings,
> Jared
> --
Robert Q Kim, Wireless Internet Provider
http://evdo-coverage.com/satellite-wireless-internet.html
http://groups.google.com/group/unpaid-overtime
2611 S. Pacific Coast Highway 101
Suite 203 Unpaid Overtime Dept
Cardiff by the Sea, CA 92007
206 984 0880
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/