Re: [Full-disclosure] Hash

[Peter Besenbruch <prb@xxxxxxxx>]

Tremaine Lea wrote:
> Sure, it's possible.  Possibly Sergio is lazy.  As he sent it via  
> gmail's auth smtp servers and not from webmail, it's just as possible  
> it happened in his mail client.

And he still could have, and should have edited it.

> And all of that aside, who cares?  We see signatures like that all  
> the time on mailing lists.  It's pretty obvious they're useless in  
> this context.

Useless in any context. Sigs. like that are very unprofessional. Even if 
I know they are nonsense, such disclaimers come across as mildly bullying.

-- 
Hawaiian Astronomical Society: http://www.hawastsoc.org
HAS Deepsky Atlas: http://www.hawastsoc.org/deepsky

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/