[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- To: "Kevin Finisterre (lists)" <kf_lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Busting The Bluetooth Myth
- From: "Giorgio Fedon" <giorgio.fedon@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 18:37:48 +0200
Hi Kevin,
I could understand that vendors are charging simple CSR dongles (19
dollars??) up to thousands of dollars.
But the way to publish a paper making a direct reference (if someone is
aware about the underlying piece of software he is talking about) to a
particular vendor it's not so cute. Maybe they have written their firmware.
Worse is to sustain the fact that the world need a better bluetooth sniffer,
using the information that can be found inside the warezed version of the
tool. The opensource community I think that is able to do it's own research
without software piracy.
2007/4/1, Kevin Finisterre (lists) <kf_lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Giorgio if anything he is blowing the whistle on the vendors that
charge a metric shit ton for a piece of hardware that is not necessary.
-KF
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/