[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft
- To: David Litchfield <davidl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Which is more secure? Oracle vs. Microsoft
- From: endrazine <endrazine@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:43:37 +0100
Hi,
David Litchfield a écrit :
> Hey all,
> What started out as a fun project for me turned out some serious results -
> "Which is more secure? Oracle vs Microsoft" is a paper I put together
> looking at the number of security flaws in the Oracle and MS database
> offerings. For those that are interested, you can grab a copy of the results
> here: http://www.databasesecurity.com/dbsec/comparison.pdf
> Cheers,
> David
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
No offense David, but those two products don't serve the same purpose :
you just can't use
MS Sql for big databases. It's a bit like asking "which is more secure :
Oracle or gcc" ?
What's the point ? How can this be relevant ??
Cheers,
endrazine-
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/