Re: [Full-disclosure] Windows Command Processor CMD.EXE Buffer Overflow

[Nick FitzGerald <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Brian Eaton wrote:

> Is there a reason that a buffer overflow in cmd.exe matters?
> 
> If the attacker is sending arbitrary input to cmd.exe, haven't they
> owned the box anyway?

Without trying to test anything, it just may be exploitable via a 
"shortcut" file or a Packager "package", either embedded or in the form 
of a standalone (.SHS or similar) file.  If so, that potentially opens 
up a few "assisted remote" (i.e. the user has to double-click an 
attachment, click a URL link, etc) exploit options...


Regards,

Nick FitzGerald

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/