[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Full-disclosure] OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this

To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this
From: pauls@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:10:12 -0500

--On September 11, 2006 8:20:51 PM +0100 c0ntex <c0ntexb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You are entitled to your opinion.

Yeah, and it sucks this his is fact-based, doesn't it?

Paul Schmehl (pauls@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

Attachment: p7sgAY4dgKFzw.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Full-disclosure] OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this
  - From: c0ntex

References:
- [Full-disclosure] OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this
  - From: c0ntex
- Re: [Full-disclosure] OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this
  - From: Philosophil
- Re: [Full-disclosure] OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this
  - From: c0ntex

Prev by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this
Next by Date: Re: [Full-disclosure] OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this
Previous by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this
Next by thread: Re: [Full-disclosure] OT - Check this out - Full disclosure is apt for this
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread