[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Full-disclosure] Tempest today
- To: <tonu@xxxxxx>, <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Tempest today
- From: <Bryan_McAninch@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:57:20 -0500
http://the.jhu.edu/upe/websites/Jon_Grover/emr.pdf
Van Eck's research paper has no references pre-1965, which I presumed he would
have used had it available. Can you provide a reference to the original
research from the 1950s?
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tonu Samuel
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2006 8:37 AM
To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Tempest today
On Friday 18 August 2006 19:09, Bryan_McAninch@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I believe the attack to which you're referring is known as Van Eck
> phreaking; it was discovered in the mid-80's. TEMPEST is a USG standard
> for limiting/eliminating EMR emanations and was declassified in the
> mid-90's (which you mentioned). Faraday shielding seems to have been
> used effectively as an EMR eavesdropping countermeasure, though I'm
> uncertain if its pervasively used.
Just to be exact, Van Eck did not discovered it first. He just first who made
homebrew system in university. Original roots of this attack go back to
1950-s.
Tõnu
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/