On 8/15/06, <...> <massimo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yeah, that's a good one.
first: spam a security list of some disgusting and sick porno shit
Ok, what makes you think Bea Arthur is Porno?
second: pretend you did not....
I sent out Pictures of Bea Arthur, not the Animal Porno you stupid idiot
third: pretend we believe you....
I dont really care what you think if you cant tell the difference
between somedirtyposter@xxxxxxxxx and DudeVanWinkle@xxxxxxxxxx
I was trying to interject humor into one of the worst spammings I have
seen on FD in order to take the edge off. I think of Bea Arthur as
AntiPr0n, so I figured they would cancel each other out and everyone
would be a little happier having something to laugh at while wading
throuhg the schlock.
Once again, If you think sending animal pr0n to FD is something I
would do, then you are a fool.
-JP
----- Original Message -----
From: Dude VanWinkle
To: Peter Besenbruch
Cc: full-disclosure
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Reverse LOL HELLO FURRY PORN
On 8/15/06, Peter Besenbruch <prb@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dude VanWinkle wrote:
> > What? you can dish it but you cant take it?
>
> No, I just filter. I suspect a lot fewer people will be reading your
> e-mails, Dude.
You do know I didnt send out the pr0n right?
Just trying to make light of the situation
________________________________
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/