[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] FD Charter
- To: Stack Smasher <stacksmasher@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] FD Charter
- From: morla <morla@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 19:27:37 +0200
i agree with stacksmasher...
please setup a filter in ur mail client if it rocks you....
m0rla
-- choooOOooooochoooOOOOOOooOOOOOOooooO
Stack Smasher wrote:
> Dude, Go fuck yourself! If you don't like this list then don't
> subscribe, simple as that. I think most people on this list believe
> that censorship in any form is wrong whether you agree with what
> people say or not. And to say that someones E-Mail message is "libel"
> just shows you have no fucking clue what you are talking about, we own
> the interweb, we create the laws and no one will ever stop us. That's
> why this list is called "FULL DISCLOSURE" not Matt Burnett's fucking
> whine blog about everything that is sad in my life.........
>
> Stacksmasher
>
>
> On 8/2/06, Matt Burnett <marukka@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The charter says the list is supposed to be "self-policing". How do
>> we take action against offending members, short of a d0s? The charter
>> also says that management can remove members for "spamming" or
>> "misappropriation". Have anyone from management read any of n3td3v's
>> posts? Am i the only on who considers n3td3v's posts to libel?
>> Couldnt his/her advertising his/her own list be considered spam. I
>> really want to know how a group can be self-policing if they have no
>> ability to take action?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/