[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] scanning
- To: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] scanning
- From: schanulleke.29172787@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 12 Jun 2006 09:23:51 -0000
--- Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> What's this mean? It means that if you
scan some lame-ass system and it
> crashes as a result, you might be in deep
shit. And "it shouldn't have
> crashed from a portscan" does *not* hold
up in court.
Having done pen-testing in the past I have disabled (dos-ed)
systems and entire networks with a portscan.
My employer would never let
me do any work withaout a prior written agreement.
However, law is highly
fluctuate over time and from country to country. Dutch law recently changed.
In the past you had to have broken a security barrier in order to be accused
of hacking, now it has changed to "with the intent to do harm".
Is it
illegal? Not enough data to compute / that is one for the lawers...
Is it
unwise? Probably...
Will you get cought/sued? Unlikely...
Would I bother
to sue you? No...
Schanulleke
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/