Re: [Full-disclosure] SSL VPNs and security

[Tim <tim-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Sure, it's trivial to create self-signed certs (or run a CA), but 
> distributing your cert (or the CA cert) to all but a handful of clients 
> is a logistical nightmare.

For company managed laptops, it is trivial to distribute via normal
software distribution processes.  For non-managed systems (which you
shouldn't allow into your network via a VPN anyway), installing a CA
cert is as simple as clicking on a link ONCE, and installing the cert.
This cert can be distributed over a VeriSign secured SSL connection.
Then when the website presents a page, it can dynamically sign certs for
each domain.  This stuff isn't really that hard.  The tools that the
industry has provided users just suck, that's all.

> If you're going to be installing stuff, might as well make that a 
> IKE/IPSEC client and do it the right way to begin with.

Well, I don't disagree with this one, but so many people who complain
about certificate distribution have not thought through the ways it can
happen.  Even with a real VPN, you really should be using client certs
anyway, which present the same distribution problems.  These problems
aren't made any easier by using a "trustyworthy" CA which charges you.
The software you use is the biggest contributor to management headaches.

tim

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/