Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: blocking tor is not the right way forward. It may just be the right way backward.

[Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:33:39PM -0400, Michael Holstein wrote:
> >Your interpretation of the Internet is a bit distorted.
> 
> We're not talking about authenticated websites here (perhaps I should 
> have made that more clear), nor are we talking about using TOR, etc. for 
> malicious purposes.
> 
> For the purpose of this (largely theoretical) argument, I meant 
> "publicly accessible, non-authenticated websites".

Just because a park is a public place doesn't give me the write
to, lets say, drive a car over the grass.

Even if public places there are rules that should be followed.

- -- 
Rodrigo Barbosa
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEiafypdyWzQ5b5ckRAvOQAKCed74EcYcxkphgBWt0yrCtlpe2/wCgvFG3
qg91GcAr7Twpg6hcxJiVQzY=
=G/OL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/