On 5/19/06, Andrew Smith <andrew.rse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There are a lot of moderated lists. This isn't moderated. That is the point of this list. Don't be an idiot, just because there are a few idiots about doesn't mean that you should call for a fd->bugtraq change. On 5/19/06, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx > wrote: > On Fri, 19 May 2006 14:48:59 PDT, Daniel Veditz said: > Aaron Gray wrote: > > Heres a call for moderation before it gets too late. > > I've lost my chart, can anyone remind me how many drinks that rates on > the Full-Disclosure drinking game? Something like two, plus one for > every ten replies? At that rate, you're looking at a case, maybe a case and a half of tequila already.
And I quote, from http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2005-September/036962.html "And if you want a moderated subset of this list you can go to: https://lists.seifried.org/mailman/listinfo/security And subscribe to my security list (includes BugTraq, Full-Disclosure, multiple vendor lists). -Kurt" Kurt, at one time, had a list dedicated to only full-disclosure, which was full-disclosure-moderated. That list was apparently merged into his moderated security list. ( http://lists.seifried.org/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure-moderated ) Now let's just end this thread and whomever wants a moderated version can subscribe to the aforementioned list. You will also note, that in the moderated+combined list that this entirely useless and offtopic thread is missing. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/