[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Full-disclosure] Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??**
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Full-disclosure] Re: **LosseChange::Debunk it??**
- From: "Dave \"No, not that one\" Korn" <davek_throwaway@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 16:02:52 +0100
Pete Simpson wrote:
> This demonstrates that if the model were valid the minimum possible
> duration of complete collapse would be 87.9 seconds.
Well then, this demonstrates that your model is not valid.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/