[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Full-disclosure] **LosseChange::Debunk it??**



--On May 16, 2006 11:48:01 PM +0100 Pete Simpson <Pete.Simpson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The official account of 9/11, as affirmed repeatedly by governments and
media, therefore contradicts Newton's Second Law of Motion by at least a
factor of ten (out by an order of magnitude). Newton's Laws may have
stood the test of time admirably for centuries, but as we have been told
time and again, the world changed irreversibly on the 11th of September
2001 and officially, by implication, so too did the Newton's Laws of
Motion.

Wow. I guess you're more knowledgeable than some of the most eminent scientists in the US (physicists and structural engineers, architectural engineers, etc., etc.), who modeled the collapse of the towers and proved conclusively that it happened exactly the way witnesses saw it.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/

Attachment: p7ssm95ndrGMG.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/