On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:00:22 PDT, Bill Stout said: > > You know, having made a few NTexploit lists in the past, I wanted to > make the point the M$ was less secure. Unfortunately the facts were > against me. > > Two IIS 6.0 vulnerabilities reported from 2003-2006 > http://secunia.com/product/1438/ > Twenty-eight Apache 2.0 vulnerabilities reported from 2003-2006 > http://secunia.com/product/73/ Scroll down a bit, and you'll discover a nice pie chart of how critical they were - 50% of the IIS were 'Moderate', while only 33% of the Apache were. You can make statistics lie any way you want. ;) Also, selecting IIS/Apache, which is installed on few Windows or Linux boxes by default, doesn't tell you anything regarding the underlying security. You could as well chosen Microsoft Office and OpenOffice and made the same claim.
Attachment:
pgp5ER2TUOGbp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/