[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification
- To: "Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx" <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] RE: WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification
- From: InfoSecBOFH <infosecbofh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:45:41 -0800
None whatsoever because there are line ups of n00bs like n3td3v
begging to take SANS courses.
On 1/5/06, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 04:15:27 PST, InfoSecBOFH said:
>
> > "I did it because SANS said so..." Yes sans is always right and L0pht
> > was a bunch of blackhats too.......
>
> So tell me - how much money does SANS make if they lose their reputation
> as being right on security? Seems like they have a vested interest in
> being right, at least a high percentage of the time....
>
> Or look at it another way - between SANS and Microsoft, which one is more
> likely to be straight-up and honest regarding a security issue?
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/