[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RE[Full-disclosure] WMF Risk Analysis for Win9X anyone ?
- To: full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: RE[Full-disclosure] WMF Risk Analysis for Win9X anyone ?
- From: Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 20:25:49 -0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 03:50:39PM -0500, Technica Forensis wrote:
> > >What ARE the real risks (or lack of them) for Win9X/ME systems ?
> I think the risk he is that they are running Win9x/ME.
You are so right. I mean, it is not as if one of my clients had
a US$ 300K HPLC connected to a Win98 computer, with software that will
not run on a newer version of Windows. It makes total send for him
to ditch the HPLC, buy a new one, just so he can upgrade to a new
version of MS pet OS.
- --
Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
"Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDvu5tpdyWzQ5b5ckRApqyAJ4l6RXe44nBH16rCxOaTzTBNcBabgCeNgyu
wu+zCCca8NHqZg0j4nR3RoI=
=Ct1Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/