[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Full-disclosure] Re: Re[2]: [funsec] WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification
- To: Pierre Vandevenne <pierre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Full-disclosure] Re: Re[2]: [funsec] WMF round-up, updates and de-mystification
- From: InfoSecBOFH <infosecbofh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 04:18:23 -0800
Oh come on Pierre.. you are talking to a reporter here... it is as
much of a rootkit as Metasploit is a virus. Again... you are talking
to a reporter so it is about as usefull (especially in this case) as
talking to you morning dump before you flush.
On 1/3/06, Pierre Vandevenne <pierre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Good Day,
>
> Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 12:59:22 PM, you wrote:
>
> GE>> The "patch" by Ilfak Guilfanov works, but by disabling a DLL in Windows.
> PV>> I wouldn't say it does that. If you really want to simplify it in the
> LS> extreme, it hides the vulnerable function.
>
> LS> Think of it as a "White Hat Rootkit"
>
> Or merely a TSR hooking an interrupt vector. It doesn't hide itself.
> It doesn't allow any kind of remote access to anything.
>
> I can't see how it could even be remotely described as a rootkit.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Pierre mailto:pierre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/