Re: [Full-disclosure] complaints about the governemnt spying!

[bkfsec <bkfsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 08:04:43 CST, Leif Ericksen said:
>  
>
> > There are those laws that are direct and clear cut, and there are the
> > ones that takes an act of congress to decide what is legal or not.  ;)
> >    
>
> And then there are those you're not allowed to even *see*.  In Gilmore v. Ashcroft,
> the Department of Justice finally consented to allow a *judge* with a security
> clearance to see the text of the law, but Gilmore and his attorneys are still
> denied access to what the law says.
>  

Which begs the question... How do you break a law that you don't know 
exists?

How can one be expected not to break the law if the law is never made 
available?

                  -bkfsec


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/