Re: [Full-disclosure] BANTOWN PRESENTS: Give me 0day or give me death

[InfoSecBOFH <infosecbofh@xxxxxxxxx>]

Of course you won't respond because your tiny little brain cannot
figure out anything to defend your tripe.

Other than my comparisson between your mommy and the Internet I made
some pretty good arguments that you obviously have no reponse to.

Figures..

Oh and I just did your little google search...

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/12/16/bush.nsa.ap/

Is the first link and the only legitimate link (if you believe CNN
that is) on the first page.  So again, I find you exagerating things
to make your point.  Don't get me wrong, I do not support Bush in the
least but your argument is boyond weak...



On 12/18/05, Andrew A <gluttony@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would like to apologize for throwing the term fascist around so lightly,
> but I do not know many labels to apply to someone who does not feel that
> freedom of political expression is not an inalienable right. Nevertheless,
> consider this my retraction of that part of my post.
>
> I had hoped for a mature discussion of the various philosophical and
> epitemeological issues on the table without it becoming tainted by posts
> like these.
>
> Regarding your comments on the fourth amendment point: I am guessing you do
> not pay attention to what goes on in the world. Just to let you know, a
> simple search on Google News for "bush fourth amendment" will bring up
> countless articles detailing Bush's flagrant, intentional violation of the
> United States Constitution. I will not respond to the rest of your post as
> it is ridden with personal attacks, logical fallacies, and factual
> innaccuracies, but if anyone else would like to bring up similar points in a
> mature manner I would be happy to respond to them.
>
> On 12/18/05, InfoSecBOFH <infosecbofh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > So as much as you hate it, the internet calls the DoD daddy just like
> > you as a small child, created by that drunken night an Amsterdam whore
> > was raped, called a woman that everyone uses mommy.  Go figure,
> > everyone uses mommy and everyone uses the Internet yet they both still
> > had owners.  The Internet owned by the US DoD.  Your mommy owned by
> > crack cocaine and a pimp hand.
> > ...
> > Sure there is.  If that code is unauthorized or unwanted on the
> > machine then there are ethical and moral violations if you introduce
> > that code.  To bring this back to something you understand.  It was an
> > ethical and moral violation for the owners of your mommy to introduce
> > heroin into her system, but yet she executed the syringe willingly.
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/