Re: [Full-disclosure] A CALL FOR FULL-DISCLOSURE TO BECOME A MODERATED LIST

[Joe Average <yahooinsider@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/15/05, uber@xxxxxxxx <uber@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I WOULD JUST LIKE TO EXPRESS MY DEEP SUPPORT FOR THIS IDEA.  MAKING
> THE LIST MODERATED WOULD REALLY HELP MY JOB AS A SECURITY
> RESEARCHER.  I COULD MAKE QUICKER, MORE WELL INFORMED CHOICES IN MY
> DAY TO DAY TASKS OF PEN TESTING LEGITIMATELY.  I WILL ONLY GET THE
> GOOD STUFF AND NONE OF THIS PISSING CONTEST WHICH IS KILLING THIS
> LIST.  MODERATING WOULD MAKE THE LIST MUCH MORE PROFESSIONAL AND
> WOULD BRING IT ONE STEP ABOVE SECURITY FOCUS.
>
> ONCE AGAIN.  I AM 150% FOR THE MODERATION OF FULL-DISCLOSURE.


no need,

a) ban all gmail addresses
b) ban nicknames (real name only)
c) start inforcing list policy for trouble makers who attack legitimate
researchers like netdev

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/