[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] McAfee VirusScan vs Metasploit Framework v2.x
- To: H D Moore <fdlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] McAfee VirusScan vs Metasploit Framework v2.x
- From: Mike Hoye <mhoye@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 15:00:33 -0500
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:17:30PM -0600, H D Moore wrote:
>
> Looks like some overzealous idiot at McAfee added "Trojan" signatures for
> 202 files in the latest version of the Metasploit Framework.
This is entirely as it should be. Accounts that don't have permission
to tell McAfee to ignore Metasploit are virtually guaranteed to be
accounts that shouldn't have Metasploit in the first place.
--
"Why does Sea World have a seafood restaurant? I'm halfway through my
fishburger and I realize, Oh my God... I could be eating a slow learner."
- Lynda Montgomery
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/