[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Snort as IDS/IPS in mission-critical enterprisenetwork
- To: <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Snort as IDS/IPS in mission-critical enterprisenetwork
- From: "sk" <sk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:22:29 +0100
> Because of NDA, I cannot *name* the network where I was a part of the team
> installing and maintainting SNORT on a large network, but I can tell you
> that this network is one of the top tier-1 NSPs. I can tell you that
> SNORT is the sole such product chosen for this purpose, and that it works
> better than we could have possibly hoped for. last I looked, SNORT was
> being used on circuits as large as OC12s.
well it wouldnt be good to name those anyway as you dont know how many
snort 0-days exist and the next time something goes public could mean that those
networks are targeted first. afterall its up to you, i just thought i give you
guys this hint.
its never a good idea to make such information public, thats why many people
fake their daemon versions, or dont show them at all.
-sk
Http://www.groundzero-security.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "J.A. Terranson" <measl@xxxxxxx>
To: "Native.Code" <native.code@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <full-disclosure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Snort as IDS/IPS in mission-critical
enterprisenetwork
>
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Native.Code wrote:
>
> > Is Snort enterprise ready where it can be deployed to monitor
> > mission-critical network?
>
> Yes. It is, and has been for some time.
>
> > If any of you can name any big network which is using Snort as an example,
> > it will be very helpful.
>
> Because of NDA, I cannot *name* the network where I was a part of the team
> installing and maintainting SNORT on a large network, but I can tell you
> that this network is one of the top tier-1 NSPs. I can tell you that
> SNORT is the sole such product chosen for this purpose, and that it works
> better than we could have possibly hoped for. last I looked, SNORT was
> being used on circuits as large as OC12s.
>
> The problem isn't going to be your sensor (SNORT et al), but your back end
> software - *that* part is a bitch!
>
>
> --
> Yours,
>
> J.A. Terranson
> sysadmin@xxxxxxx
> 0xBD4A95BF
>
>
> I like the idea of belief in drug-prohibition as a religion in that it is
> a strongly held belief based on grossly insufficient evidence and
> bolstered by faith born of intuitions flowing from the very beliefs they
> are intended to support.
>
> don zweig, M.D.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/