Re: [Full-disclosure] Return of the Phrack High Council

[Mike Klein <mkleinpeter@xxxxxxxx>]

I would only add that if EVERYBODY bottom-posted on a particular forum 
and ALWAYS snipped unnecessary prior posts...then I would do the 
same...just out of courtesy for established protocol.

Just as I have my own coding conventions which I use for my own code, 
yet if I'm editing another owner's source I will follow their 
established conventions...just to not break continuity...and of course 
not to be a jerk.


mike

Kyle Lutze wrote:
> yeah, that was a slight accident, the first one I composed only went 
> to him since I didn't hit reply-all, and didn't fully edit the second 
> one. :/
>
> ok, so I'm a bit of a hypocrite sometimes too. Also, I didn't mean to 
> say wikipedia's definition was a way to go, I was just using that to 
> show my reason without having to put it all in
>
> Kyle
>
> Mike Klein wrote:
> > And yet you quoted netdev's entire email for no good reason 
> > whatsoever...another breach of supposed netiquette.
> >
> > Top vs. bottom posting is a bunch of crap. With 20 years experience 
> > in computing I have yet to see consensus on this issue....regardless 
> > of wikipedia definition.
> >
> > I subscribe to numerous mail lists/etc. and far prefer top 
> > posts...less scrolling to bottom too see what is being said. If 
> > people snipped orig post than bottom posting would <possibly> be 
> > preferrable...but quite often this isn't the case...and very often 
> > extremely verbose crap like images/etc. (dammit' mom get with the 
> > program) is often left in as well.
> >
> > mike klein
> >
> > Kyle Lutze wrote:
> >
> > > now, can't you post correctly in a mailing list? 
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/top_posting I mean come on, a computer 
> > > guru not knowing about that?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/