[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Full-disclosure] BitchX local root
- To: Sha0lin <Sha0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] BitchX local root
- From: c0ntex <c0ntexb@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:01:07 +0000
"Presented below is an exploit for BitchX, a linux IRC client. If the
BitchX binary is installed SetUID (to allow SSL access for non root
users for example), an attacker can exploit a stack overflow and gain
root privileges."
"BitchX local root"
lies, lies.
On 23/11/05, Sha0lin <Sha0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 1) BitchX is not setuid by default, so is not dangerous bug,
> 2) the exploit's date is fake
>
> you can test the vuln with this exploit:
> http://www.securiteam.com/exploits/6J00B2KBFU.html
>
> regards,
>
> Sha0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>
--
regards
c0ntex
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/